PDA

View Full Version : Pj64 vs Windows


Pages : 1 [2]

Anonymous
4th January 2008, 06:06 PM
agreed with the others -- linux version please!

Anonymous
5th January 2008, 07:13 AM
first of all, how do i get project 64? :p

Anonymous
8th January 2008, 08:40 AM
the developers aren't gonna just make a linux version. please sign the petition for it to be open source! tinyurl.com/yov2w3

Anonymous
10th January 2008, 12:12 AM
hi guys i want to download Direct3d for Project 64 please helppppppppppp from where can i download it????????? :'( ;) :)

Anonymous
10th January 2008, 06:01 PM
i want project 64 version 1.7 or 1.8 where can idownload it? :)

Anonymous
14th January 2008, 07:31 PM
were can i down load prodject 64 1.7

Anonymous
16th January 2008, 08:59 AM
fock you project!

Anonymous
18th January 2008, 04:23 AM
Just make PJ64 use OpenGL and then port it to Mac OSX.
DirectX sucks!!!

Anonymous
21st January 2008, 07:34 AM
LINUX !!!!!



if you dont have at least one distro of linux on your compy (dual boot or main) yer a nub,

Anonymous
30th January 2008, 11:38 AM
Can you port Project64 to the Mac OS X?

Anonymous
7th February 2008, 10:51 PM
Hate to say it, but windows 200 support is something I'll need unless I can get Debian support. :)

Anonymous
15th February 2008, 08:16 AM
uju eaea jajajajaj good mother fucker jakajakjakjakjak ;D ;

Anonymous
21st February 2008, 04:19 AM
linux support would be great

Anonymous
24th February 2008, 10:38 PM
i thgink your are all fucking homo's like vinie

Anonymous
29th February 2008, 02:00 PM
yo qiero intalar

Anonymous
6th April 2008, 09:08 AM
Linux
Make tarball, rpm, deb, etc.

Anonymous
11th April 2008, 07:54 PM
c'mon please GPL this program so we can have a Linux version! when it was made open source before, the license was too restrictive for people to be interested!

Anonymous
12th June 2008, 08:05 AM
I say dont stop trying to get it to work on windows 98 I still use it and cant afford windows xp or vista cause I'm always broke

Anonymous
16th June 2008, 06:49 AM
By now only XP and Vista.

Anonymous
17th June 2008, 02:25 PM
I don't think Windows 98 should be a priority, since it's 10 years old. If it was open-source, somebody could make a legacy fork though. But until that happens, I think Win2k should be the minimum.

Anonymous
29th August 2008, 06:15 PM
Please make a Linux version of PJ64.
you see that there is a large number of people begging you to make a Linux version.
Linux is not hard, Linux is different (even my 7 year old son runs Linux) why cant you develop it then? are you smarter than a 7 year old?
Linux is the fastest growing OS on the market.
you guys were the ones who asked which OS to support, so you got your answer.

Anonymous
24th September 2008, 02:46 AM
tank you ;D

Anonymous
29th September 2008, 05:15 PM
Really amusing the people dissing Vista are probably the people who've never touched the OS in their life or are just too stupid to understand computing and have massive attacks of paranoia about DRM. In Vista I play games like Crysis with full DX10 effects at smooth framerates (although my PC is always on the bleeding edge, I never stop upgrading :p) I watch all movies and listen to all music I've downloaded/ripped myself. I even run downloaded games and games I've cracked with no problems. Exactly how is DRM a problem in vista? I've not experienced it and I've been using it as my main OS pretty much since it's release. Initially it pissed me off but since spending time using it more and since the software/driver support has improved over time most people are just spewing out bullshit based on early/no experiences with the OS in the first place.
Anyway imo any OS older than 2K should be dropped, I'm quite surprised to see the amount of people still using 2K so it's probably best to keep the support for it as I don't think it would be too difficult to implement with it being an NT system.
Also I'm not surprised to see the people asking for a Linux version. As much as I used to love Linux and used it for quite a while the lack of support where games are concerned made me drop the OS completely. Linux will never get mainstream gaming support and anyone who thinks otherwise is just fooling themselves, checking out PC games these days they're mostly cheap, direct and badly optimized ports of console games done as an afterthought with no interest in the PC gaming industry, usually PC versions are just out there for a quick buck more than anything so it's unlikely they'd even acknowledge Linux support much less consider it. It's pretty sad to see PC gaming cheapened so much by money grabbing fuckheads in companies like EA and Lucasarts. Wow I really have no idea how to stay on topic...