written by TzakShrike
I would like to keep Win2k support, as I only just started running this on Win2k :P
Prior to this, I have used it primarily with XP, but now I've got a machine dedicated to this purpose, and I'm running Win2k as a compromise between usability (USB2.0, Bluetooth, etc) and speed (older versions of Windows run faster... because they have to).
I don't really want to give up this speed gain (even if it's only minor), however I could cope with having to run XP.
Also, other legacy systems support (95/98) could be useful to some people who further value the speed of the old OSes over, say, their USB2.0 driver stack, so if it isn't too much work, I think they should stay around.
But yeah, 2k at the least, because it's faster (slightly) and supports much the same stuff at the moment.
|