Originally Posted by theboy181
lets not try and change history here.
Hard to really know what you mean.
The PR I linked to was quoting history, not changing it. It is fact that variable-size RDRAM allocations were made possible by that commit; there's no "history change" about it.
I hardly see room for conclusion that I was bragging, either. The PR I linked to moreover was to clean up the case-by-case switch model of the function to have some mathematical algorithm to it. Incidentally, this allowed any-size RDRAM settings. It's nothing for me to brag about, and it's nothing for you to get jealous and butthurt over either.