#121  
Old 14th May 2007, 04:49 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Anonymous

Oh man, the suspense is KILLING me! When will the Vista version be released? It feels like it's been weeks since you guys announced the project...
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 14th May 2007, 06:52 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Danno

Download link above "account login" :P. Down with Vista! Blech.. I've heard nothing but bad reviews from the folks at my job, and I worked at Microsoft. :-\
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 15th May 2007, 04:44 PM
whubbard whubbard is offline
Project Supporter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
written by Bjørnar, April 17, 2007

You should support
Windows 2000 (many use it still)
Windows Xp
Windows Vista
And a Linux and/or Mac version of PJ64 would be nice
:End Quote

I very much agree with him and what he said, however I feel that Mac support is not nearly as needed as Linux. People using emulators are much more likely to be using Linux/Windows than a Mac.

Also, why bother to make sure 1.7 works with 98 or ME. For starters they are both not used very often. I would go as far to say that ME is not used, period, as the OS is basically unusable. Also 1.6 will still be available for download, so its not like you haven't provided an emulator for them.

I am using vista ultimate 64-bit, and 1.6 and 1.7 work for me. (just putting that out their)
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 15th May 2007, 04:46 PM
whubbard whubbard is offline
Project Supporter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3
Default

p.s.
VISTA IS GREAT! As long as your P.C. can actually run it, its wonderful. Features are great, it runs faster than XP on my main desktop (and also on my laptop).
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 16th May 2007, 03:13 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by The Wise Man

Oh pleaseget a linux version plz plz I have tryied every other 64 emulator for linux nowhere near as good a project64 trust me!!!
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 16th May 2007, 04:27 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Rodrigo

I really think it would be good to cut off win98.
Also, I don't know if it's possible or too much work, but maybe if ther was DOS version of Project, it would be easir for OS to use it
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 19th May 2007, 05:10 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Pontius Laurentius

I got Vista Home Premium 64-bit, works fine for me. I wonder how fast an actual 64-bit build would go...

Works great already.
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 20th May 2007, 06:12 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Silencer

I am using Windows Vista Home Premium 64 Bit.
The 32 Bit emulation part works fine, but as
soon as I open any ROM Vista says there is a
problem with the program and forces me to shut
it down. Probably PJ64 is using some Windows
function that was removed or changed in Vista.
Oh and where I am just going to add a comment
on the internet: Do not buy Vista it is gay.
Just wanted to warn anyone who is going to buy it.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 21st May 2007, 06:41 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by radorn

Win2000 support is important to me xD, for now at least...
I plan get into XP with some custom version (the complete package is loaded with too much shit for my taste) of it someday, since so many things I'm interested in are getting their w2k support dropped.
For me, I would love all this planned obsolescence crap wasn't done, but I guess one can't but deal with it, as there's no real viable alternative right now (and yes, I migrated completelly to linux, and stayed there a whole year without touching windows... the more I knew about linux the less I liked it and the less I believed it's superiority... For what I care, they are equally crap, and at least in windows I can have some fun without dealing technically with attrocious OS desing or absence there of).

If you drop w2k, it's just one more reason to "update" after so much time. I would need to buy a better computer to take advantage of the new and exciting stuff anyway, so why not update along the way???
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 21st May 2007, 11:15 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by SH4RK B1T3

PJ64 team, use common sense. Trying to appease the lowest common denominator is simply bad policy. You, and us the majority, should not have to pay for someone else's laziness of not wanting to upgrade their system. Forget about the 95, 98, and ME hobos, and just get it work with XP and Vista. The only reason XP should get compadibility is because Vista is a steaming pile of crap ATM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
other pj64 news
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.