#101  
Old 30th April 2007, 10:32 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by slimshady007

keep Windows 2000 (many computers from '99 through XP's release run Windows 2000 better than XP but still have good enough hardware), XP, and (of course) add Vista
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 30th April 2007, 02:44 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Kenichi340

Keep supporting Windows 2000, XP and add Vista.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 30th April 2007, 03:30 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by deke

mmm these older os is really underated i was a xp user but pc crashed ...got windowsa me and ill never go back to xp now.but i dont program on it do what you want.here would be a os i would use when its complete for a xp subsitute called reactos.
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 30th April 2007, 03:33 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by deke

by the way isnt 2000 xp the same in a nut shell ? like 98 me?
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 30th April 2007, 04:00 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by deke

another comment jabos jnes is really great!!
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 30th April 2007, 04:16 PM
AlwaysMC2 AlwaysMC2 is offline
Project Supporter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Default

XP and Vista. That's all that matters.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 1st May 2007, 06:17 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Sebastián

Well, days ago I wrote about Linux support and became open source. I found something interesting: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nintendo_64_games
Now I think that the challenge should be make a checklist of all of the 396 games released for the Nintendo 64 and then try to support all of them (Trying to work perfectly). Later decide about the rest, Linux port, to Vista or not to Vista, Mac or not.
What do you think guys?
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 2nd May 2007, 10:38 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by advenT

I use windows 2000, and don't have any plans to change to XP currently... It's a very stable version of windows and uses very little resources in comparison to XP/Vista... also viruses are no longer extensively directed toward it. I would appreciate it if you guys continued to support 2k in your next releases.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 3rd May 2007, 01:05 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by kHound

I'd actually suggest keeping support for Win98,98SE and ME: this is because N64 was an old unit and a fair number of the folks into emulation use, they use older OS's.. I can't justify Win95 though....

though I'd prefer Linux support over 9x if that choice had to be made.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 4th May 2007, 04:02 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Zyan

I think you should drop support for the Win98/ME, but not for Win2000.

I can guess the difficulty, but a Linux/Mac port would be very appreciated!
Wine couldn't be helpful in this case, because PJ64 uses DirectX.. so only Cedega can execute the emulator. Am I right?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
other pj64 news
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.