is it safe?

[CA5]

Originally Posted by Mdkcheatz

Yes he was, but innocent or not, if you go and steal something buy "accident" (like slippin it in your pocket without thinking) they wont let you slide by because you are innocent... They are likely to pull you off to the side and assess the situation and tell you not to do it again. I never said magmarock64 wasn't innocent, but he was sincere about it and now realises that it isn't accepted and why... So he's off the hook as far every everyone is concerned :P

So, pmming people concerning roms and where to find them was either deliberate, making you guilty... or accidental and you're going to apologise, right :S

[HatCat]

Not to mention, 1.d4 Nc6 2.d5 Nb8 3.e4 e5 4.Be3 d6 5.Nc3 f5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.Bd3 cxd5 8.exf5 d4 9.Qh5+ Kd7 10.Qf7+ Qe7 11.Qxe7+ Bxe7 12.f6 gxf6 13.Bf5+ Kd8 14.Bxc8 Kxc8 15.Bxd4 exd4 16.Nce2 Nc6 17.O-O-O Nh6 18.Nxd4 Rg8 19.g3 Ng4 20.f4 Nf2 21.Ngf3 Nxd1 22.Rxd1 Kd7 23.Nf5 Rac8 24.Rd2 b5 25.N3d4 Nxd4 26.Nxd4 b4 27.a4 bxa3ep 28.bxa3 Rc7 29.Nb5 Rb7 30.Nc3 Rgb8 31.a4 f5 32.Rd5 Rc8 33.Nb5 a6 34.Nd4 Rbc7 35.Rxf5 Rc4 36.Nf3 Rxc2+ 37.Kd1 Rf2 38.Nd4 Rb8 39.Kc1 Rb4 40.Rd5 Rxa4 41.Nc2 Ra2 42.Rd2 Rxc2+ 43.Kxc2 Rxd2 44.Kxd2 a5 45.Kd3 a4 46.f5 a3 47.Kc3 d5 48.g4 d4+ 49.Kb3 d3 50.h3 d2 51.Kc2 a2 52.Kxd2 a1=Q 53.Kd3 Bf6 54.Ke3 Qd4+ 55.Kf3 Qd3+ 58.Kf2 Bh4+ 59.Kg2 Qe2+ 60.Kg1 Qf2+ 61.Kh1 Bg3 62.g5 Qf1#

and no not really

[Mdkcheatz]

Originally Posted by xcdjy

So, pmming people concerning roms and where to find them was either deliberate, making you guilty... or accidental and you're going to apologise, right :S

Not following you... please elaborate...

[omegadox]

Hmmmmmmmmm, no need to PM people, check here for the best ROMs

[CA5]

Originally Posted by Mdkcheatz

Not following you... please elaborate...

Not following me? Or not wanting to follow me? Please elaborate

[HatCat]

1.d4 Nc6 2.e4 e5 3.Nf3 exd4 4.Nxd4 Qh4 5.Nc3 Bb4 6.Qd3 Nf6 7.Nxc6 dxc6 8.e5 Ng4 9.Qd4 Qe7 10.f4 Bc5 11.Qa4 Nf2 12.Rg1 Ne4 13.Nd5 Qh4+ 14.g3 Bf2+ 15.Kd1 Bg4+ 16.Be2 Bxe2+ 17.Kxe2 Qg4+ 18.Kf1 Qd1+ 19.Kg2 Qxg1+ 20.Kf3 Qd1+ 21.Kxe4 Qxd5+ 22.Kf5 h5 23.Qb4 g6+ 24.Kf6 Qe6+ 25.Kg7 O-O-O 26.Qxb7+ Kxb7 27.Bd2 Rdg8#

I never had respect for the Scotch Game, simply trading off the most powerful of the eight pawns for Black's King's pawn on E5, which is destined to be by some means moved to a different file or sacrificed for major initiative attacks anyway. In addition, white foolishly moved the knight from the King's bishop's third square--the most critical element in the safety of your King and fundamental key behind flexible manouvering and love in chess--just reclaiming the pawn.

Material-based chess engines would continue after searching into deep Ply to find the guarantee in that White will reclaim the pawn play as such: 5.Nb5 Bb4+ 6.c3 Qxe4+ {more known is 6...Ba5, pessimistically assuming ...Qxe4 loses to Nd2} 7.Be3 Ba5 8.Nd2 Qg6! 9.Nc4 a6 10.Nd4 Nge7 11.Nxc6 Nxc6 12.b4 Nxb4 -+

The rival engine to Virtual Chess 64 JESTER, a Java chess engine that seems to have more contrasting disagreements with this one than any other combination in all three phases, has good play to demonstrate the "Pulling Counter-attack" once the opening book is removed. Opening books are just silly masks to hide the nature of the chess engine's real play, a symbol of failure to really try properly emulating chess.

Originally Posted by Topken

i would assume your talking bout virtual chess for n64 there rswedlow

Someone besides me actually knows an N64 chess game exists? I'm impressed.
I was actually playing Chess Titans.

Ironically for some reason VC64 is the chess engine I have played the least. I did try out Virtual Kasparov for the GBA and that sorry game for the NES, but mostly of else I've played JESTER, Jchess, and Chess Titans for Windows Vista.

Over the course of 1700 years all of its lifespan has chess never had a master. It originated as a device of military tactics to respond to those who unwisely challenged kings.

Originally Posted by Mdkcheatz

Not following you... please elaborate...

Brandon, you're in college, solve this.
log base x of x = -1.0

[Topken]

meh i was never any good at chess go figure. im not ot good at any of the board games to be honest with you.

[HatCat]

A reason I talk minimally about myself as a researcher of chess in real life, is because people seem to enjoy bringing up the opportunity to mention "Go".

I so don't care. I don't play chess because I think it's better than Go, and I refuse to express pride for either.

I never yet learned to play Go because at a quick glance although it is a fascinating study for the capabilities of complex problem-solving by machines to emulate, it has by comparison virtually no sociological value or philosophical meaning to growing life. Also I'm shy, but that's a lesson for another time.

[omegadox]

Hmm, my dad is interested in all that stuff chess, go, etc. He once got a real Go board, I think it was expensive, and yet, we have barley touched it. I myself, I like reversi.

[HatCat]

I got my ass kicked at Reversi. I tried to learn how to play just by making experimental moves on software like I did chess and maybe play some human opponents, but even for those few times I won on beginner software levels I don't even remember how nasty I felt looking into that game. I don't remember a damn bit about how to play .... I learned how to play both in Sixth Grade 2002?.

In my past lifetime minus my dark beginning that year, I have played 0 serious games with another human player. 99.9% of my correspondence-level education on chess comes from playing a computer. The battle between human and machine intellect that would revolve about chess lasted only in their beginning days.

One reason I don't play humans, is because I actually do, just note for my quote those "serious games" over the board. I haven't found anyone who can beat me these years...except today's club owner, who has a terrible opening theory, but my high anxiety, pressure, and inexperience with timing imbalances can sometimes over-boost my confidence beyond my sorrowful style of playing and make a highly losing move. Generally I started out winning both games against the owner and several times threatened mate to his surprise--but cannot maintain myself always.
His opening theory sucks. All humans suck at the opening phase of chess, dang. Relaxed in my chair testing machines, no I'm not really that anxious.