#21  
Old 17th April 2007, 05:22 PM
oceanblue oceanblue is offline
Project Supporter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
Default

I vote of Windows XP and newer only.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 17th April 2007, 06:17 PM
GaveUpTomorrow GaveUpTomorrow is offline
Alpha Tester
Project Supporter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11
Default

Windows 2000, Xp, and Vista. I still use windows 2000, but mostly I stick to XP. Still though, a lot of people still use 2000, and to me, it's one of the best OS's available (much faster than XP at times).
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 17th April 2007, 06:47 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Joshua

Definitely support Win 2000... Most all other companies still do. I wouldn't support 95/98 though as they have been officially ended by Microsoft.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 17th April 2007, 08:04 PM
zilmar zilmar is offline
Core Team
Alpha Tester
Project Supporter
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 988
Default

smiff wrote:
there isn't really any "Win98 code" to remove and get a magic speedup (there is some Win9x specific code but for things like ini operations where that OS has limitations, not in core emulation) - this is mostly about us no longer having to test every build on so many operating systems. which is a PITA. and as someone above said, so we can be clear about exactly what we support. there is no intention to deliberately break Win9x support either afaik..
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 17th April 2007, 09:47 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Sam

I also think that Windows 2000 should still be supported. A lot of people use it as an alternative to XP because it isn't as much of a resource hog.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 17th April 2007, 09:50 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by DrLight

Win2k and WinXP support should be sufficient for the Windows users (nobody should be forced to use Vista so I wouldn't mind dropping the Vista support efforts :-) ). Also I would be happy to see a Linux / Unix / MacOS port; for example using Winelib.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 17th April 2007, 10:01 PM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by Willy Gazina

Windows XP and Ubuntu would be nice. Maybe just get it working in wine? It's not hard to test it against winelibs. Of course that means it will PROBABLY run in ReactOS, too...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 18th April 2007, 02:15 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by RandomMofo

i don't give much of a damn about vista, but i'm using win2k and still sticking to it. supporting it should be relatively easy, since XP is merely an overhauled win2k and therefore shares the same core features. on the other hand, i agree that previous windows versions should be just dropped. just my tuppence.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 18th April 2007, 03:40 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by sean1

my two cents?- drop win9x support! thanks guys! keep it up!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 18th April 2007, 06:40 AM
Anonymous Anonymous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,068
Default written by RaphaelZ

Oh, the win98/ME/2000 suport is very important!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
other pj64 news
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.