|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Actually I've just accomplished a couple major things.
First is that I've simplified the squares of both a and b. The second is that I redefined or rewrote the base definition for the sine of one degree. Not too sure anymore how I managed to arrive to the one I came up with before; I'll sort through my tens of papers I've used up writing math to find out what mistaken factoring I might have done later. ![]() So, going back to the raw conclusion of the sine of one degree: Substituting the variable "a" for the sum of all those radicals and the variable "b" for the imaginary root radical, we begin from the top of this image I rendered. ![]() Not converted to a real number definition yet, but at least the denominator is rationalized. Factorization and squaring followed by un-squaring should help remove remaining imaginary terms.
__________________
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/cat_vs_internet |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good job for doing
*mumbles something incoherent* *claps
__________________
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I spent about 4 hours across 3 sheets of paper (both sides) finding the identity, square, and cube of 16 sine 1.
![]() Not the must useful information here but possibly useful in the future. Obviously, plugging in the values for a and b allow for further integer division across the left-hand and right-hand sides of the equations. I can do that later. It seems I have no choice, regardless, but to finish conducting my operations on binomials defined in terms of a and b. lol, thanks I guess, with this amount of work (as well as in general) positive feedback is kind of useless compared to negative feedback or constructive criticism XD
__________________
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/cat_vs_internet |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To be honest I haven't really been following you XD Although if you find the sine of one, tell me...
wait that's what you're doing, right? Also, I think you mean most useful.
__________________
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yup. My typos pretty much always come in the form of completely different words. It's annoying as Hell.
I will update with some more information I derived a couple nights ago when I eat and get around to it. In the meantime, focusing on the same exact branch of math is kind of boring, so I don't mind if you change the subject to something else about math XD. Hell, maybe I can use this thread to give you math problems to solve, since you're so good at math from what I've read. ![]() ![]()
__________________
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/cat_vs_internet |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
*is too busy coloring the shapes to notce
__________________
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The last 24 hours I have made no progress as far as this project here. I was disconnected the entire day because of FatMan-ism and/or forgetfulness / not caring, but I made use of my time regardless.
![]() Still, useful piece to the puzzle here, is the product of a and b. I've found 2ab, a component used when squaring a binomial in terms of a and b. ![]() And, as usual, proof that I've calculated ab correctly: Code:
var sqrt05 = 2.23606797749979; number = -512 * Math.sqrt(9 - Math.sqrt(30 + 6 * sqrt05) - sqrt05); var aper16 = -0.209343824971776; var bper16 = 3.9945181390183; // * i = sqrt(-1) var abperi = -214.074292772154; /*number = aper16 * bper16 * 256; = -214.074292772154; */ There's only one thing left undone. How can I define b without just taking the square root of b^2 and winding up with the original value of b I took from the original source? a isn't a nested radical like b is, even though their squares are very similar in structure in terms of the radical bases used, so surely there must be a way to re-define b as the sum of several radicals (like the way a is written in that image) and not just one big, messy nested radical? Damn, how do I do that? I have to find out why the two expressions are equal; I haven't finished solving for the bi-conditional statement yet.
__________________
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/cat_vs_internet |
#48
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And as for you. How the hell am I going to get you off my back in this thread
![]() Well before I waste any time uploading images of problems, I'll just ask you something algebraic. (x - 5)(x + 3) + 2 = +2. There, see if you even know what the hell a polynomial function is. Solve for x.
__________________
http://theoatmeal.com/comics/cat_vs_internet |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The answer is zero
![]() |