|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
120hz monitors swap in new frames at 8.3ms intervals and input lag is almost never perceived by anyone.
__________________
CPU:Intel Xeon x5690 @ 4.2Ghz, Mainboard:Asus Rampage III Extreme, Memory:48GB Corsair Vengeance LP 1600
Video:EVGA Geforce GTX 1080 Founders Edition, NVidia Geforce GTX 1060 Founders Edition Monitor:ROG PG279Q, BenQ BL2211, Sound:Creative XFI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro SDD:Crucial MX300 275, Crucial MX300 525, Crucial MX300 1000 HDD:500GB Spinpoint F3, 1TB WD Black, 2TB WD Red, 1TB WD Black Case:NZXT Phantom 820, PSU:Seasonic X-850, OS:Windows 7 SP1 |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't really want to lower the refresh rate below 60hz, as it will appear as though the game is not running at 60FPS, and you'll also get tearing unless you turn V-sync on. It can also create a really blurry image that's hard on the eyes, depending on your display.
The difference between 60hz and 120hz isn't really noticeable, eventually we'll all be using 120hz just through progression of technology, but until they're commonplace, there isn't really any point in upgrading, especially for PJ64, when the emulator doesn't even show more than 60FPS, which means a 120hz monitor will just show the same frame twice. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
30Hz is really quite painful to play on. You're better off waiting for a display standard that can support the resolution at 60+Hz.
|
![]() |
Tags |
4k2k, redundant, resolution, uhd |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|